Comparison of Quality of Life between Patients Undergoing Chronic Hemodialysis with Reusable Dialyzer and Single-Use Dialyzer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Lucky Aziza Bawazier, Suhardjono Suhardjono


Background: in Indonesia, majority of hemodialysis centers use reusable dialyzer for cost efficiency reason. Currently, there is no available data regarding the quality of life of the end stage-renal disease patientwho use reusable dialyzer measured by a standardized questionnaire, as it was stated that at molecular level, reusable dialyzer could worsen leukocyte activity and could affect patients complaints and symptoms.
Methods: this was a retrospective cohort study which involved 39 subjects. All subjects underwent hemodialysis at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. The study was conducted in March September 2017. All subjects had experienced two kinds of dialyzers, the reusable dialyzers (before 2015) and the single-use dialyzers (after 2015). Of all patients, 19 patients did not know the change of dialyzers. Subjects were interviewed with Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form 36 questionnaire. Results: in kidney disease component dimension, there was a significant mean difference between reusable group (68.74; SD 13.22) and single-use group (74.87; SD 13.54) (Wilcoxon test, p=0.01). The Physical Component Summary dimension, in reusable group was 63.65; SD 27.07 and in single-use group was 69.38; SD 23.07 (Wilcoxon test, p=0.217). The Mental Component Summary dimension, in reusable group was 71.78; SD 21.54 and in single-use group was75.27; SD 22.30 (Wilcoxon test, p=0.127). Bivariate analysis and further analysis showed significant association between income less than 5 million rupiah and low quality of life (p=0.048). Conclusion: the reusable dialyzer membrane lowers the ESRD patients quality of life influenced by another factor such as low income.


Kidney disease quality of life; end-stage renal disease patients; reusable dialyzer; single-use dialyzer


Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Riset kesehatan dasar. Jakarta: Kemenkes RI; 2013. p. 132.

Perkumpulan Nefrologi Indonesia. 7th report of Indonesian renal registry. Jakarta: PERNEFRI; 2014.

Galvao TF, Silva MT, Araujo ME, Bulbol WS, Cardoso AL. Dialyzer reuse and mortality risk in patients with end-stage renal disease: a systematic review. Am J Nephrol. 2012;35:249-8.

Upadhyay A, Sosa MA, Jaber BL. Single-use versus reusable dialyzers: the known unknowns. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2:1079-86.

Jaar BG, Chang A, Plantinga L. Can we improve quality of life of patients on dialysis? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:1-4.

Theofilou P. Quality of life in patients undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis treatment. J Clin Med Res. 2011;3(3):132-8.

Maldiyono B, Moeslichan S, Sastroasmoro S, Budiman I, Purwanto SH. Perkiraan besar sampel. In: Sastroasmoro S, Ismael S, eds. Dasar-dasar metodologi penelitian klinis. 4th edition. Jakarta: CV Sagung Seto; 2011. p. 360.

Rivara MB, Cohen CR, Kestenbaum B, et al. Changes in symptom burden and physical performance with initiation of dialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease. Hemodial Int. 2015;19(1):147-50.

Finkelstein FO. Performance measures in dialysis facilities: what is the goal? CJASN. 2015;10(1):156-8.

Al-Jumaih A, Al-Onazi K, Binsalih S, Hejaili F, Al-Sayyari A. A study of quality of life and its determinants among hemodialysis patients using the KDQOL-SF instrument in one center in Saudi Arabia. Arab J Nephrol Transplant. 2011;4(3):125-30.

Sathvik BS, Parhthasarathi G, Narahari MG, Gurudev KC. An assessment of the quality of life in hemodialysis patients using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. Indian J Nephrol. 2008;18(4):141-9.

Watanabe Y, Ohno Y, Inoue T, Takane H, Okada H, Suzuki H. Home hemodialysis and conventional in-center hemodialysis in Japan: a comparison of health-related quality of life. Hemodial Int. 2014;18:532-8.

Lemos CF, Rodrigues MP, Veiga JRP. Family income is associated with quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease in the pre-dialysis phase: a cross sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:202.

Manavalan M, Majumdar A, Kumar KTH, Priyamvada PS. Assessment of health-related quality of life and its determinants in patients with chronic kidney disease. Indian J Nephrol. 2017;27(1):37-43.

Fukushima RLD, Menezes ALC, Inouye K, Pavarini SCI, Orlandi FDS. Quality of life and associated factors in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis. Acta Paul Enferm. 2016;29(5):518-24.

Manen JGV, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, Reuselaars MC, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT, et al. Changes in employment status in end-stage renal disease patients during tjeir first year of dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International. 2001;21:595-601.

Rao M, Guo D, Jaber BL, et al. Dialyzer membrane type and reuse practice influence polymorphonuclear leukocyte function in hemodialysis patients. Kidney International. 2004;65:682-91.

National Kidney Foundation. A clinical update on dialyzer membranes: state-of-the-art considerations for optimal care in hemodialysis. NKF: New York; 2017.

Pereira BJG, Natov SN, Sundaram S, et al. Impact of single use versus reuse of cellulose dialyzers on clinical parameters and indices of biocompatibility. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7:861-70.

Feldman HI, Bilker WB, Hackett MH, et al. Association of dialyzer reuse with hospitalization and survival rates among U.S. hemodialysis patients: do comorbidities matter? J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;209-17.

Poppe C, Crombez G, Hanoulle I, Vogelaers D, Petrovic M. Improving quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease: influence of acceptance and personality. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(1):116-21.

Cruz MC, Andrade C, Urrutia M, Draibe S, Martins LAN, Sesso RDCC. Quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clinics. 2011;66(6):991-5.

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Acta Medica Indonesiana